jReality - the forum

-antlr
-itextpdf
-janino
-netutil
-xstream
- jinput
- xpp3
- libpd
- jterm
done

TODO:
- jacknativejar

Hi petsagouris,

I'll first apply my new tutorialscript with the old third-party libs and afterwards I'll start updating the third party libs like you suggested.

thx 4 your effort

best
Andre

Hah, now I got it. You are using software rendering! I switched from jogl to software-rendering and got the same results. Looks like flat-shading for softwarerendering is broken... Which OS (Linux 32bit/64bit, windows, mac etc. ) do you use? How do you handle jReality (eclipseproject or jars) best a...

Try

Code: Select all

		JRViewer v = new JRViewer();
		v.addBasicUI();
		v.setContent(rootnode);
		v.registerPlugin(new ContentAppearance());
		v.registerPlugin(new ContentLoader());
		v.registerPlugin(new ContentTools());
		v.startup();

Instead of "JRViewer.display(rootNode); "

And than again window->leftslot

Have you already tried "flat shading" for the surface?

which jRealityviewer do you use?

In general you can enable flat shading with: "Window" -> "Left Slot" -> left click on "Faces" -> toggle "Flat Shading"

I've checked the stl-reader-class. It seems to be ok. That means that your data is probably screwed up, when you convert it to stl.

Have you tried to convert it in an other format? obj/vrml etc.

best
andre

I just checked your face.stl It looks like that some of the normals are screwed up. I'll show you some screenshots: There is one big normal failure at the upper right side of your face and some smaller at the "grid" directly in the front of the face. I look if I can find/create some simple .stl file...

With this I can help you directly. The spacenavigator-classes are excluded from the release. If you want to work with the spacenavigator you should work with an eclipse project:

http://www3.math.tu-berlin.de/jreality/ ... p_tutorial

Hi Ted, I was also thinking about that. I'm pretty sure, that it is not possible to render with two different jogl-versions. So I think jReality and Matlab need the same jogl version in classpath. We are already working on a new jogl-backend but this may take some months... There is already one hard...

Hi ted,

I hope I'll find some time to improve the forum tomorrow.

Just a simple reminder for not loosing the link for the update:
https://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=1697155

A couple of years ago we had an running spacenav. As far as I know Stefan still have one running at his desk. As soon as I find one flying around I'll do some tests.

best
andre

can you pls post some of the images you get and if possible even add or e-mail an example STL-File. With this info and data we should be able to fix your problems.

Hi dunmatt, nice that you could solve your problem by your own. To solve your final question: Yes, it was a version issue of jogl. Unfortunately we aren't running the newest version of jogl and jogl isn't supporting our used version anymore. So we have to maintain/keep the "old" jogl for our self at...

I'm applying your setup right now. I've downloaded the images out of the forum and moved them to the right position (edit: LOL I've just remarked, that you can upload files directly from the wikipage too. -> You should be able to do that as well ). Thx for your help. EDIT: there is no "Quick Access"...

Looks great, feel free to edit ;)

EDIT: you probably have to send me your pics that I can move them at the right position.
The problem is, that I'm now in holidays for 3 weeks. So please sent the pics to steffen weissmann, that he moves them to path/to/mediawiki/images/image.jpg

jReality - the forum

Search found 222 matches

Re: How about making jReality awesome?

Re: How about making jReality awesome?

Re: Smoothed models from an STL file

Re: Smoothed models from an STL file

Re: Smoothed models from an STL file

Re: Smoothed models from an STL file

Re: Smoothed models from an STL file

Re: Spacenav?

Re: jogl won't load?

Re: link from BB back to jReality.de

Re: Spacenav?

Re: Smoothed models from an STL file

Re: jogl won't load?

Re: Improving the Eclipse tutorial?

Re: Improving the Eclipse tutorial?